Barack Obama’s sex education for Kindergarteners is finally getting some attention. I wrote about this over a year ago… John McCain has a new commercial out referencing Obama’s frightening views. Rush Limbaugh also spent a decent amount of time talking about it this week. It’s an old story that has somehow been ignored up till now.
I’m not really surprised that the media ignores it, or that the liberals running against Obama in the democrat primary didn’t make issue of it, but it’s frustrating. You start to wonder what world you are living in when this isn’t a huge issue. I can’t imagine a normal person being ok with teaching sex ed to 5 year old children. Barack has even said that his wife has taught their 6 year old about homosexuality. Don’t you think voters should know about it?
I hope John McCain runs those ads until every citizen in the United States of America knows about it. Liberals repeat lies until they become facts to many people. When you have facts that would sicken most Americans, I think it should be repeated daily until it is understood. How many people would support this for children? I think a large percentage of people would consider it child abuse. Do you want it forced on your kids by your school?
Beware of the “age appropriate” justification they offer. How vague can you be? Who decides what is appropriate? A stranger does. Some of the course objectives of the sex education legislation are listed below.
Barack Obama voted yes to bill SB0099. Here is just a little of it:
Course material and instruction shall stress that sexually transmitted infections are serious possible hazards of sexual activity or behavior.
Pupils shall be provided with statistics based on the latest medical information citing the failure and success rates of all contraceptive methods in preventing unintended pregnancy and HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.
Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, non consensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.
Course material and instruction shall teach male pupils about male accountability for sexual violence.
Here is some interesting things that were struck out of the language (amazing) :
sexual abstinence until marriage
abstinence is an effective method of preventing unintended is the expected norm in that abstinence from sexual intercourse is the only protection that is 100% effective against unwanted teenage pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and HIV acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) when transmitted sexually.
Course material and instruction shall teach honor and respect for monogamous heterosexual marriage. Course material and instruction shall stress that pupils should abstain from sexual intercourse until they are ready for marriage.
Course material and instruction shall include a discussion of the possible emotional and psychological consequences of preadolescent and adolescent sexual intercourse outside of marriage and the consequences of unwanted adolescent pregnancy.
such courses of instruction shall include the teaching of prevention of unintended pregnancy and all options related to unintended pregnancy, as the alternatives to abortion,
Much of what is in the program is probably very good — for high school students. But for kindergarteners? How can you teach this stuff without teaching them what sex is? Despite how vague they are on what is age appropriate for kindergarteners or other ages as well, there is one part that isn’t so vague. “Course material and instruction shall be free of sexual orientation biases.” Therefore you can expect your child to be told that gay sex is perfectly normal. What age is that appropriate? If you believe in any of the major religions of the world the answer would be never.
The ironic and sick part of it is Obama supported infanticide because he was worried that the Born Alive Infant Protection Act could somehow be misinterpreted to be an “anti-abortion statute,” despite the law only applying to fully born babies. He’s not worried about this abomination being misinterpreted.
The whole thing is ridiculous. How do you accurately teach about the risks of sexually transmitted diseases without offending homosexuals? Can you teach that aids and other sexually transmitted diseases run higher for homosexual activity? Would it be against the law to teach the statistics of that? Most likely. We’ve been getting closer to this kind of world without the help of Barack Obama. Again, all this stuff is up to strangers to decide. Most likely if someone did teach statistics that showed the additional risks of homosexual activity they would be fired.
You really have to question the motives of anybody who supports such despicable legislation. The whole thing is so vague it is open to countless abuses. Abuse of little children – in the classroom… Just who is Barack Obama really trying to help here? I’ve never been a big John McCain fan, but how anyone could vote for Obama knowing what he supports and knowing how he tries to double talk his way out of it is beyond me. Are you ready for that world?
“I remember Alan Keyes . . . I remember him using this in his campaign against me,” Obama told a group from planned parenthood. “‘Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners,'” Obama said – mocking Alan Keyes. “Which — I didn’t know what to tell him. But it’s the right thing to do.”
— Barack Obama (video)